Your Daily Dose of Inspiration: Kazimir Malevich

Kazimir Severinovich Malevich (23 February 1878 – 15 May 1935) was a painter, art theoretician, pioneer of geometric abstract art and one of the most important members of the Russian avant-garde. He was also the founder of the art movement Suprematism.

Suprematism is an art movement founded by Malevich in Russia which focused on geometrical abstraction that evokes emotion and contemplation. Malevich himself describes this revolutionary art movement as “the supremacy of pure feeling in creative art.”

Black Cross

Black Cross, 1923

Black Circle

Black Circle, 1923

Black Square

Black Square, 1923

When, in the year 1913, in my desperate attempt to free art from the ballast of objectivity, I took refuge in the square form and exhibited a picture which consisted of nothing more than a black square on a white field. The critics and, along with them, the public sighed, “Everything which we loved was lost. We are in a desert…Before us is nothing but a black square on a white background!”


Suprematism, 1916-1917

Two-Dimensional Self-Portrait, 1915

Woman Torso

Malevich’s earlier work showed great influence of cubism and futurism.

Bureau and Room, 1913.

An Englishman in Moscow, 1914

Soldier of the First Division, 1914

When Stalinism took hold in the Soviet Union from 1924 on, the Stalinist regime began limiting the freedom of artists and prohibited abstraction and divergence of any artistic expression. This of course led to the confiscation of many of Malevich’s work, and he was banned from creating and exhibiting similar art. Malevich nevertheless retained his main conception. In his self-portrait of 1933 he represented himself in a traditional way — the only way permitted by Stalinist cultural policy — but signed the picture with a tiny black-over-white square.

Self Portrait, 1933

1 comment
  1. Wendy Chouinard said:


    I’m a student doing a paper on Russian art. I’m trying to tie in the politics of the time period of 1933 with Malevich’s signature on his portrait above. It looks like it’s his way of “sticking it” to the regime. Do you know if there were any repercussions about that signature?

    Anything you might have to say on this topic would interest me.

    Thank you,
    Wendy Chouinard

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in: Logo

You are commenting using your account. Log Out /  Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )


Connecting to %s

%d bloggers like this: